alliance defending dom criminalize homoesexuality

The brief was filed on 29 July, about four weeks before Texas’s abortion ban went into effect. The argument was made in an amicus, or “friend of the court”, brief in which outside parties can present arguments on cases before the court. The supreme court is due to hear a Mississippi case this term that experts say could lead to the reversal of the Roe decision by the court’s conservative majority. But when this court announces the overruling of Roe, that individual can simply change their behavior in response to the court’s decision if she no longer wants to take the risk of an unwanted pregnancy.” “One can imagine a scenario in which a woman has chosen to engage in unprotected (or insufficiently protected) sexual intercourse on the assumption that an abortion will be available to her later. “Women can ‘control their reproductive lives’ without access to abortion they can do so by refraining from sexual intercourse,” Mitchell wrote in the brief. Former Texas solicitor general Jonathan Mitchell, who played a pivotal role in designing the legal framework of the state’s near-total abortion ban, also argued on behalf of anti-abortion group Texas Right to Life that women would still be able to terminate pregnancies if Roe was overturned by traveling to “wealthy pro-abortion” states like California and New York with the help of “taxpayer subsidies”.

Alliance defending dom criminalize homoesexuality